The best B2B SaaS paid media agencies in 2026 are Understory Agency, Directive Consulting, Hey Digital, AdConversion, Single Grain, Powered by Search, NoGood, Refine Labs, TripleDart, and Disruptive Advertising. Each one earns its place for a different buyer, and this guide tells you which.
Here is the problem this list exists to solve. Most paid media agencies optimize for the metrics that are easy to show in a dashboard: clicks, form fills, cost per lead. Six months in, the dashboard is full of green arrows and your pipeline looks exactly the same. The agencies below were selected because they run paid media against the numbers that matter to a SaaS operator, CAC, pipeline created, and revenue, and because, wherever review data exists, their own clients say so on the record.
Why listen to us
We run paid media for B2B SaaS companies every day at Understory Agency. We manage campaigns across LinkedIn, Google (Search, Display, YouTube), Meta, Reddit, and X, plus review-site placements on G2 and TrustRadius, for funded B2B SaaS teams across every stage of ad spend. We charge flat retainers instead of a percentage of spend, because percentage-of-spend agencies are incentivized to spend more, not to convert more. That incentive problem shapes how we evaluated every agency on this list.
Yes, we put ourselves at number one. Nearly every agency that writes one of these lists does the same, and few say so out loud. We're saying it, and we've kept the pros and cons honest for everyone, including us. Judge each entry on the evidence.
Understory Agency publishes sixteen named client testimonials and eight video case studies on understoryagency.com, from founders and marketing leaders at companies including Clay, Retention.com and RB2B, Nylas, Wiza, and Remofirst. Here are six of the written ones, verbatim:
“Alex and Ali have a deep understanding of full-funnel pipeline generation. Ads, email, creative, landing pages, demand gen, lead gen, Clay. They've got you covered. They're a small, scrappy team that cares about results. Go with Understory to run your allbound and you will not be sorry.”
“This team excels across all channels, and there was no other agency that knew our audience better or could execute at their level.”
“Understory team did a thorough audit on our paid media campaigns, found multiple weak spots, and proactively suggested tactics for us to implement. We were so impressed with the audit that we hired them for both paid social and paid search that week.”
“Since partnering with Understory, LinkedIn Ads has become one of our top acquisition channels, delivering some of our largest sales opportunities every week.”
“At the start of the new year, we observed a 40% increase in our campaign performance, a testament to their hard work and expertise.”
“I worked at Google for over 10 years with many performance marketing agencies and Understory is one of the best.”
Best B2B SaaS paid media agencies at a glance
| Agency | Best for | Pricing | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| Understory Agency | Series A–C SaaS that wants paid media + GTM engineering as one motion | Custom flat retainers for each service; never a percentage of spend | 16 named testimonials + 8 video case studies (Clay, RB2B, Nylas, Wiza) |
| Directive Consulting | Mid-market and enterprise SaaS tying spend to CAC and LTV | Custom; most engagements $10K–$49K | 4.8 on Clutch (56 reviews) |
| Hey Digital | Early-stage SaaS that needs paid ads plus creative | From $5,000 | 4.6 on Clutch (4 reviews) |
| AdConversion | Teams already spending who need attribution cleaned up | Custom | Thin public footprint; ask for references |
| Single Grain | SaaS that wants paid, SEO, and content under one roof | From $10,000 | 4.8 on Clutch (12 reviews) |
| Powered by Search | B2B SaaS that wants integrated demand gen (paid + SEO + ABM) | From $5,000 | No verified Clutch reviews at check |
| NoGood | Startups that want a growth squad, not a vendor | Custom | 5.0 on Clutch (1 review) |
| Refine Labs | Later-stage SaaS rebuilding demand gen philosophy | Premium, custom | $50M+ ARR client base |
| TripleDart | SaaS teams that want a dedicated pod at efficient cost | Custom | 250+ SaaS brands by their count |
| Disruptive Advertising | High-spend accounts wanting big-shop PPC process | Custom | $450M+ annual spend managed |
What to look for in a B2B SaaS paid media agency
Use these eight criteria before you book a single call. They separate the agencies that move pipeline from the ones that move dashboards.
- Incentive structure. Flat retainers align the agency with conversion. Percentage-of-spend pricing aligns the agency with spending. Ask how they charge before anything else.
- Pipeline reporting, not MQL reporting. The agency should report CAC, pipeline created, and closed-won influence inside your CRM, not a screenshot of platform metrics.
- B2B channel depth. LinkedIn and Google behave completely differently for a $30K ACV product than for ecommerce. Ask for SaaS-specific proof.
- Creative included. Ad fatigue kills B2B accounts quietly. If design isn't in the retainer, your ads will run stale while you negotiate change orders.
- CRM integration from day one. If the agency can't see your HubSpot or Salesforce, they're optimizing blind.
- Speed to launch. Competent agencies launch in one to two weeks, not one to two months.
- Honest scope. An agency that only does paid will hit a ceiling the moment your problem becomes landing pages, outbound, or attribution. Know where their scope ends before you hit it.
- Reviews you can verify. Read the agency's Clutch and G2 profiles yourself. The quotes below are pulled from them.
1. Understory Agency

Best for: Series A–C B2B SaaS that wants paid media and GTM engineering run as one coordinated motion.
| Specialty | Paid media + GTM engineering, run as one allbound motion |
|---|---|
| Best for | Series A–C funded B2B SaaS, services, and AI-native companies |
| Channels | LinkedIn, Google (Search/Display/YouTube), Meta, Reddit, X, G2/TrustRadius |
| Pricing | Custom flat retainers for each service; never a percentage of spend. Each price and scope is built for the client's needs |
| Reviews | 16 named written testimonials and 8 client video case studies, from leaders at Clay, RB2B/Retention.com, Nylas, Wiza, Remofirst, and more |
Understory Agency is B2B-first, built for funded SaaS, services, and AI-native companies. Full disclosure: this is us, and this is our list. Here is the honest case.
Most agencies run paid media as an island. Understory runs it as one half of an allbound motion, paid media on one side, GTM engineering on the other, so the intent signals your ads generate actually trigger outbound, retargeting, and sales follow-up instead of dying in a dashboard. Campaigns run across LinkedIn, Google Search, Display and YouTube, Meta, Reddit, X, and review-site placements on G2 and TrustRadius.
The operating model is an eight-step system that runs from initial strategy and audience research through creative development, campaign execution, optimization, lead management, scaling, and CRM-integrated down-funnel reporting. Two details matter more than they look. Every package includes ten hours a month of design, so creative refreshes never wait on a change order. And most campaigns launch seven to fourteen days from kickoff.
Pricing: custom. Both paid media and GTM engineering run on flat retainers, never a percentage of spend, and each price and scope is built specifically for the client's needs.
Pros: paid media wired directly into outbound and CRM rather than run in isolation; flat-retainer incentives; design included; founder-run accounts (Alex Fine and Ali Yildirim run the company that runs your account).
Cons: B2B only, so consumer brands should look elsewhere; a focused team, not a 200-person holding company, so if you want a big-agency bench this isn't that; and our own third-party review footprint on Clutch and G2 is still being built, so apply criterion #8 to us as hard as to anyone.
What clients say: 16 named client testimonials and 8 video case studies are published on understoryagency.com. A few of the videos worth watching:
- How Adam Robinson scaled LinkedIn Ads from $0 to $50K/month
- How a YC startup 5X'd revenue with paid ads (Hyperbound case study)
- How the 10th fastest-growing company in SF scales with allbound
- How one SaaS generated 100% new revenue from outbound in 12 months
2. Directive Consulting

Best for: mid-market and enterprise SaaS with real budget that wants spend tied to CAC and LTV.
| Specialty | Performance marketing for SaaS (Customer Generation methodology) |
|---|---|
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise SaaS |
| Pricing | Custom; most engagements $10,000–$49,000 |
| Reviews | 4.8 on Clutch across 56 verified reviews |
Directive is one of the most established performance marketing agencies in SaaS. Their Customer Generation methodology prioritizes CAC and LTV over lead-volume metrics, and they back it with serious measurement infrastructure across paid, SEO, and RevOps.
The Clutch record is the strongest on this list: 4.8 across 56 verified reviews, with the most common engagement size between $10,000 and $49,000. A senior digital manager at iCIMS called them "the strongest agency I've worked with to date." A marketing director at Corti said they "quickly became an extension of the product marketing team rather than just external consultants."
Pros: deep SaaS-specific expertise at enterprise scale; pipeline-first measurement; consistently praised project management.
Cons: reviewers note gaps when scope expands beyond core SEO and PPC, particularly marketing automation and CRM integration; pricing puts them out of reach for most early-stage teams.
Pricing: custom; plan for a mid-five-figure quarterly commitment.
3. Hey Digital

Best for: early-stage SaaS getting serious about paid for the first time and needing ad creative plus landing pages with it.
| Specialty | Paid acquisition + ad creative and landing pages, SaaS only |
|---|---|
| Best for | Early-stage SaaS building its first serious paid motion |
| Pricing | From $5,000 |
| Reviews | 4.6 on Clutch across 4 reviews |
Hey Digital does one thing, paid acquisition for SaaS, and pairs it with the creative production most small agencies outsource. That combination is exactly what a Series A team without an in-house designer needs.
Clutch shows 4.6 across four reviews with a $5,000 minimum project size. Reviewers consistently praise communication: "their weekly video updates regarding project status were impressive," said one B2B SaaS co-founder. A senior growth manager noted "the team always made a successful effort to truly understand our product and market."
Pros: SaaS-only focus; creative and landing pages in scope; transparent, high-cadence communication; accessible entry price.
Cons: reviewers note the deepest expertise sits in Google Ads, with room to grow on other platforms and in proactivity; a 10–49 person shop, so capacity is finite.
Pricing: from $5,000.
4. AdConversion

Best for: B2B teams already spending on paid who need attribution, lead quality, and strategy reconnected.
| Specialty | B2B paid ads with an attribution-first approach |
|---|---|
| Best for | Teams already spending $15K+/mo on ads with murky attribution |
| Pricing | Custom |
| Reviews | Thin public review footprint; ask for client references |
AdConversion positions itself for a specific, common situation: you're already running ads, but attribution is murky, lead quality is low, and paid, content, and sales aren't talking to each other. Their content is some of the strongest practitioner material in B2B paid media, and their campaign work spans Google, LinkedIn, Meta, Reddit, and YouTube.
Pros: sharp diagnostic focus on the spending-but-stuck segment; channel breadth; strong practitioner reputation.
Cons: a newer brand than Directive or Single Grain, with a thinner public review footprint; ask directly for client references.
Pricing: custom.
5. Single Grain

Best for: SaaS companies that want paid media, SEO, and content strategy under one roof.
| Specialty | Full-service digital: paid, SEO, and content |
|---|---|
| Best for | SaaS consolidating paid and SEO with one agency |
| Pricing | From $10,000 |
| Reviews | 4.8 on Clutch across 12 reviews |
Single Grain, led by Eric Siu, is a full-service digital agency with a long SaaS track record. If you'd rather not coordinate a paid agency and an SEO agency separately, this is the consolidated option.
Clutch shows 4.8 across 12 reviews with a $10,000 minimum. A telecom CMO wrote that "they live and breathe social ads, almost to the point of obsession." A publishing CTO said they "really felt like a partner."
Pros: genuine multi-discipline depth; senior strategic input; proactive account teams.
Cons: breadth cuts both ways, teams wanting a pure paid-media specialist may prefer a narrower shop; one reviewer wanted more time spent in the planning stage.
Pricing: from $10,000.
6. Powered by Search

Best for: B2B SaaS that wants paid, SEO, and ABM integrated into one demand gen system.
| Specialty | Integrated demand gen: paid + SEO + ABM (Predictable Growth Model) |
|---|---|
| Best for | B2B SaaS that wants one demand system, not siloed channels |
| Pricing | From $5,000 |
| Reviews | Zero verified Clutch reviews at time of check; do reference checks |
Powered by Search runs an integrated demand generation model for B2B SaaS, with paid advertising, SEO, and account-based marketing working toward the same pipeline goals under their Predictable Growth Model. They publish extensively on SaaS demand gen and have operated in this niche for over a decade.
Pros: integrated system rather than siloed channels; long B2B SaaS specialization; strong educational content that previews how they think.
Cons: zero verified Clutch reviews at the time of writing despite a strong reputation, so do your own reference checks; integrated scope means they're not the cheapest way to buy just ad management.
Pricing: from $5,000 per Clutch listing data.
7. NoGood

Best for: startups and growth-stage companies that want an experimental growth squad rather than a channel vendor.
| Specialty | Growth squads: paid media inside a broader experimentation engine |
|---|---|
| Best for | Startups that want velocity and testing across channels |
| Pricing | Custom |
| Reviews | 5.0 on Clutch, from a single review |
NoGood runs squad-based growth marketing, paid media inside a broader experimentation engine spanning organic, CRO, and content. The model suits teams that want velocity and testing across channels rather than steady-state management of one.
Their Clutch rating is a perfect 5.0, though from a single review, so weight it accordingly. That reviewer, a VP of Marketing at Invisibly, renewed the engagement because "their quality of work is excellent, and we've continued to partner with them because they are a step above other agencies."
Pros: genuine experimentation culture; multi-channel squads; strong talent density.
Cons: thin verified-review footprint relative to brand visibility; squad model is less suited to teams who just want one channel run quietly and well.
Pricing: custom.
8. Refine Labs

Best for: later-stage SaaS with substantial budget that wants its demand generation philosophy rebuilt, not just its ads managed.
| Specialty | Demand creation + paid social, philosophy-led |
|---|---|
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise SaaS ($50M+ ARR client base) |
| Pricing | Premium, custom |
| Track record | Large public body of work; client base published on their site |
Refine Labs is the agency that mainstreamed demand creation versus demand capture in B2B, and their paid media work comes wrapped in that philosophy: invest in creating demand on social, capture it efficiently on search, and measure through signals like self-reported attribution, not platform metrics alone.
Pros: category-defining strategic point of view; strong on LinkedIn and demand creation; large public body of work so you know exactly what you're buying.
Cons: their client base is mid-market and enterprise SaaS ($50M+ ARR), so early-stage budgets won't fit; the philosophy is inbound-heavy, so teams that need outbound and GTM plumbing will need another partner alongside.
Pricing: premium, custom.
9. TripleDart

Best for: SaaS teams that want a dedicated paid pod at efficient cost.
| Specialty | Dedicated SaaS pods: paid + SEO + RevOps support |
|---|---|
| Best for | Seed to Series B teams that want execution at efficient cost |
| Pricing | Custom |
| Track record | More than 250 SaaS brands by their count |
TripleDart is a SaaS-dedicated agency running paid media, SEO, and RevOps support for more than 250 SaaS brands, with delivery teams that make their pricing notably efficient relative to US shops. For seed-to-Series-B teams that need competent execution more than premium strategy, the value equation is strong.
Pros: SaaS-only client base; paid plus SEO plus ops under one engagement; cost efficiency.
Cons: time-zone and communication rhythm differ from a US agency, so set the operating cadence explicitly; less brand-name strategic cachet than Directive or Refine Labs.
Pricing: custom.
10. Disruptive Advertising

Best for: high-spend accounts that want a large, process-driven PPC operation.
| Specialty | Large-scale PPC management across Google and Meta |
|---|---|
| Best for | High-spend accounts that want big-shop process and bench |
| Pricing | Custom |
| Track record | $450M+ annual ad spend managed, 160+ team, by their count |
Disruptive Advertising is one of the largest independent PPC shops in the US, managing over $450 million in annual ad spend with a 160-plus-person team by its own count. They are not SaaS-only, which is exactly why they close this list rather than open it, but for companies with significant spend across Google and Meta who want mature process, deep audit capability, and a big bench, they belong in the consideration set.
Pros: scale and process maturity; strong auditing of wasted spend; large team continuity.
Cons: generalist client base means less B2B SaaS nuance; SaaS-specific strategy will depend heavily on which team you get.
Pricing: custom.
Which agency fits your stage and problem
Match the agency to the situation you're actually in.
- Just closed a Series A and need demand gen stood up fast: Hey Digital for focused paid plus creative, or Understory Agency if you want outbound and GTM plumbing built in the same motion.
- Paid media has plateaued and CAC keeps climbing: this is usually an attribution and incentive problem, not a bidding problem. AdConversion for the attribution rebuild, Understory Agency or Directive for tying spend to pipeline.
- Pipeline flat for two quarters and the board is asking questions: you need an agency that reports in CRM terms, not platform terms. Directive at enterprise scale, Understory Agency for Series A–C.
- Series C with GTM held together with duct tape: the fix is GTM engineering alongside paid, not more spend. That's Understory Agency's exact lane, with TripleDart as the efficiency-focused alternative.
- Budget for a philosophical rebuild of demand gen: Refine Labs.
How to choose: five steps
- Audit your own attribution first. If you can't see which channels created pipeline last quarter, fix that before hiring anyone, or hire the agency that will fix it in week one.
- Shortlist by incentive model. Cut any agency whose fee grows when your spend grows, unless you understand exactly why.
- Ask for SaaS proof at your ACV. Results at $500 ACV say nothing about $30K ACV.
- Check the review record yourself. Clutch and G2, not the agency's case-study page.
- Negotiate the first 90 days as a proof window with CRM-visible targets: pipeline created, CAC by channel, and at least one full creative refresh.
The verdict
For most funded B2B SaaS teams between Series A and Series C, Understory Agency is the strongest choice on this list, because paid media that isn't wired into outbound, CRM, and down-funnel reporting eventually plateaus no matter who runs the ads. Directive is the pick at enterprise scale, and Hey Digital is the pick for a first serious paid motion on a lean budget. Whoever you choose, hold them to pipeline, not platform metrics.
FAQ
Sources
- Clutch · Directive Consulting (2026) — 4.8 across 56 verified reviews; most common project size $10,000–$49,000.
- Clutch · Hey Digital (2026) — 4.6 across 4 reviews; minimum project size $5,000+.
- Clutch · Single Grain (2026) — 4.8 across 12 reviews; minimum $10,000+.
- Clutch · NoGood (2026) — 5.0 from 1 verified review.
- Clutch · Powered by Search (2026) — $5,000+ minimum; zero verified reviews at time of check.
- Understory · client proof (2026) — 16 named written testimonials and 8 client video case studies published on the site and their YouTube channel.
- Understory · Paid Media Management page (2026) — flat retainers, never a percentage of spend; most campaigns launch in 7–14 days; 10 hrs/mo design included.

